Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jay
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Eric "Shubes" wrote:

> What's the 's' supposed to stand for? System (as in OS)?
> Where should application scripts go by convention? Somewhere referenced by
> $PATH I'm imagining. /usr/local/bin?



Um, good guesses on the 'security' and 'system' fronts, but traditionally
(think old UNIX conventions here), the 's' in sbin stands for 'static'. It
is intended as the place for static-compiled binaries (as opposed to
dynamic-compiled binaries). Static binaries would also be best for
functions like booting and system recovery, since during those tasks
libraries and linkers may not be available/functioning.

--
~Jay


---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss