Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMMEric \"Shubes\" at <-
MMDarrin Chandler at ->
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Michael
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin
I believe the 's' stands for 'security'. but then again, what do I know?

On Sunday 03 September 2006 06:58, Eric \ wrote:
> What's the 's' supposed to stand for? System (as in OS)?
> Where should application scripts go by convention? Somewhere referenced by
> $PATH I'm imagining. /usr/local/bin?

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Plug Discuss
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: Puzzled about wireless WEPRe: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin->
Some Mailing List Archive administrated by UnconfiguredLurker (version 2.3)