Am 07. Jul, 2006 schwätzte David so:
> Has anyone administered a system using cvs? i.e. all config files are
> checked into cvs and re-checked in when a changes is made. Config files
> being, for example, /etc/hosts, httpd.conf, sendmail.cf, etc.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts pro/con to this? The google, she overwhelms me.
I use RCS on my config files. Similar to using CVS or SVN, except it's
inline as I create RCS directories where the files are and the versioning
file goes into the RCS dir.
Also, maybe consider SVN rather than CVS.
You will likely need a script that audits /etc/ looking for changes that
haven't been checked in.
ciao,
der.hans
--
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.CiscoLearning.org/
# Join the League of Professional System Administrators! https://LOPSA.org/
# "Every person who has mastered a profession is a skeptic concerning it."
# -- George Bernard Shaw
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)
