Am 07. Jul, 2006 schwätzte David so:

> Has anyone administered a system using cvs?  i.e. all config files are 
> checked into cvs and re-checked in when a changes is made.  Config files 
> being, for example, /etc/hosts, httpd.conf, sendmail.cf, etc.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts pro/con to this?  The google, she overwhelms me.

I use RCS on my config files. Similar to using CVS or SVN, except it's
inline as I create RCS directories where the files are and the versioning
file goes into the RCS dir.

Also, maybe consider SVN rather than CVS.

You will likely need a script that audits /etc/ looking for changes that
haven't been checked in.

ciao,

der.hans
-- 
#  https://www.LuftHans.com/        http://www.CiscoLearning.org/
#  Join the League of Professional System Administrators! https://LOPSA.org/
#  "Every person who has mastered a profession is a skeptic concerning it."
#     -- George Bernard Shaw