Re: Linux with Samba 3.0 runs rings around Windows Server 20…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Erik Bixby
Date:  
To: plug-discuss
Subject: Re: Linux with Samba 3.0 runs rings around Windows Server 2003 in file serving performance
http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/lurker/message/20031013.135219.7d71fd3c.en.html

On 5/15/05, George <> wrote:
> Somewhat dated but worth reviewing.
>
> >From http://www.vnunet.com/news/1144289
>
> Samba beats Windows
> Samba 3 runs rings around Windows Server 2003 in file serving performance
> Roger Howorth, IT Week 12 Oct 2003
>
> Tests by IT Week Labs show the latest version of the open-source Samba file
> and print server software is 2.5 times faster than Windows Server 2003 in
> the same role.
>
> The news comes as many firms are grappling with the consequences of
> Microsoft ending support for NT4, coupled with uncertainty about when
> Microsoft will next update Windows. The performance difference between
> Windows Server 2003 and Samba 3 has increased dramatically compared with
> Samba 2 and Windows 2000 Server.
>
> Samba provides file and print services to Windows PCs. It enables a Linux or
> Unix server to work as a file server for client PCs running Windows
> software. The new version also introduces support for Microsoft's Active
> Directory for allocating and controlling user access rights.
>
> Samba 3's scalability is as impressive as its performance. While Windows
> performance scales up well initially, it then drops off quickly as more
> clients access the server. In contrast, Samba 3 offered excellent throughput
> up to the limit of our test, conducted on a low-spec Intel server.
>
> Consequently, firms could save money on licence fees, and on hardware, by
> using Samba instead of Windows servers. IT consultant Alan Munday, who
> recommends Samba to his clients, said the resulting saving was a key
> consideration for firms.
>
> Munday is already using version 3 at some smaller sites. However, he was
> dismissive of Active Directory. "I'm not [interested in the new Active
> Directory features] because the primary focus for my smaller clients is to
> migrate away from their ageing NT servers."
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss