Re: CEntOS

Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:47 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>
>>Speaking of Centos (www.centos.org), how do you like it?
>>There were many copies of it at the ASU IF, and no one seemed to know
>>anything about it.
>
>
> CentOs 4 is an unbranded RHEL 4.0. It has a good active group behind it
> so fixes are released within a day or so of an offical redhat release.
> I'm about 1/2 way through upgrading several dozen servers to it and
> haven't run into any major problems whatsoever. The SELinux part takes
> a lot of getting used when it comes to dealing with Apache, but nothing
> that a little slight-of-hand can't fix.
>
> Daniel

Sounds like the ideal candidate to replace a RH9 server (small office).
Do you know if that's a viable upgrade path, or if I'd need to install 
Centos fresh?
-- 
-Eric 'shubes'
"There is no such thing as the People;
  it is a collectivist myth.
  There are only individual citizens
  with individual wills
  and individual purposes."
-William E. Simon (1927-2000),
     Secretary of the Treasury (1974-1977)
  "A Time For Truth" (1978), pg. 237

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss