On Apr 21, 2005, at 11:11 AM, Siri Amrit Kaur wrote:
>> I'm not saying that you cannot improve some aspects of system
>> management
>> in Windows by using a separate partition for the user profiles, only
>> that it doesn't work nearly as well as the same tactic does in Linux.
>> I
>> have been working in the Windows world for 17 years (since version
>> 1.0!), and I've only rarely used multiple partitions, primarily
>> because,
>> even with 2000, XP, or 2003, the system still has so many assumptions
>> of
>> a C: drive, that it's just easier to manage with a single large
>> partition (the settings directory works just as well for backup
>> management on C: as it would on D:, and there's not much other benefit
>> from partitioning a single drive)
>
> You make some very good points. About all a D drive can do is save
> data, not
> all the user preferences, etc that a /home partition can save.
Are you sure? I'll say up front that I have somewhat limited
experience with the sys admin side of Windows but while fooling around
with XP Pro the other day, I discovered the 'mountvol' command. From
the description, it seems that you could mount the second drive's
partition on any directory ("folder") on the C: drive. This sounds a
lot like the Linux 'mount' to me. If true, then I don't see any reason
why the second partition couldn't be mounted as
C:\Documents and Settings.
This is starting to stray a bit off topic for PLUG, but I'd be curious
to know if that's the case. Are there any Windows gurus here willing
to shed some light on mountvol?
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)