Am 26. Jan, 2005 schwätzte Jeremy C. Reed so:
> It is done by the individuals when responding. Sometimes both lists are
> Cc'd but a Reply-To is used to encourage the replies to the correct list.
>
> But I see this list already sets a Reply-To -- hopefully it doesn't
> override when it is set to something else. I will test now by setting the
> Reply-To.
The list stomped your Reply-To:.
This brings up another issue that needs a solution before we can get to
mucking w/ the reply-to.
What MUA ( mail clients ) understand reply-to-author vs. reply-to-list vs.
reply-to-all? mutt has different forms of reply commands. I don't know if
other MUAs do as well. My experiences with mutt have not encouraged me to
continue using it :(.
We have the list configged to set its own Reply-To: because we want to
encourage discussion. If most MUAs made it easy for people to choose to
reply to the list we could dispense with that. Last I surveyed ( several
years ago ) most MUAs did not do that.
ciao,
der.hans
--
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.AZOTO.org/
# Don't step in front of speeding cars, don't eat explosives
# and don't use m$ LookOut :). - der.hans
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)