I've supported qmail in a high volume config. I'd rather shoot myself than do
it again. I prefer postfix, as its stable, easy to manage, and above all FAST
(faster than qmail, as it writes one file to the spool instead of 3 like
qmail).
For spam prevention I'm having excellent luck with DSPAM (99.8% accuracy).
THe probelm is that dspam runs every time a message comes through. I haven't
seen a daemonized version yet, which would be really nice.
HTH
mike
Sanjay Darisi spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
>
>
>
> I need your opinion on spam filter and anti-virus packages for a high-volume
> email server. I'm inclined towards qmail. So, I need to install and setup good
> spam-filter and anti-virus packages, which I've no experience with so far.
> These should be capable of dealing with atleast 70,000 (average) emails a day.
> Ofcourse, most part of it is spam. I'm assuming qmail is capable of handling
> this. What is the maximum simultaneous smtp connections that qmail can handle
> anyway??
>
> The situation now is that there is a commercial Linux based spam-filter box
> that is being choked by this volume of emails. And we want to replace it with
> one of our own. So, I'm installing qmail on debian stable and looking for high-
> throughput spam-filter and anti-virus s/w for our server. If anybody here has
> experiences with such s/w, pls let me know.
>
> I feel that as SpamAssasin is perl based spam-filter, wouldn't that hog CPU for
> this kind of load. It's a PIII 1.0G, 512MB RAM IBM based e-server. I feel any C
> language based spam filter would do a better job, wouldn't it??
>
> Let me know your opinion...
>
> Thanks,
> Sanjay.
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------
> _?h_?t_?t_?p_?:_?/_?/_?w_?w_?w_?._?T_?e_?c_?h_?i_?e_?s_?A_?b_?o_?d_?e_?._?c_?o_?m_?/
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)