Stay with RH9? / Compiling Kernel is Better?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Victor Odhner
Date:  
Subject: Stay with RH9? / Compiling Kernel is Better?
der.hans wrote:
> Move all the data to a partition that won't get touched.
> Don't let the installs touch that partition.


Right. It's the "Don't let the installs touch ..." part that
I was asking about. If the installers ask what partitions
they may use, then I'm fine.

> Look at parted if you don't have any unpartitioned space
> on the disk and need to created a new partition.


You betcha! Parted really saved my bacon when I had to
rearrange my entire dual-boot system (RH8 + Win98).
I was able to create new partitions, including FAT32,
move partition boundaries, etc. All this was part of
recovering from one of my Win98 partitions going bad
and bringing in a new hard disk. Parted is really great.

This was after I was badly burned by Partition Magic,
then again by Win98's FDISK which mis-labels your
partitions with DOS drive letters instead of numbers ...
fortunately I had backed up the contents of the clobbered
Linux partition to another location.

Thanks,

Vic