On Jan 12 2004, at 17:25, Chris Gehlker was caught saying:
> From everything I read, Intel is a big Linux supporter. Now they are
> joining IBM and others in setting up the legal defense fund for Linux
> users. I think that's great but I don't understand the business logic.
> In a Windows world people are pretty much stuck on Intel iron except
> for AMD which is a much smaller company. With Linux, they can migrate
> away from Intel any time. So why is Intel pursuing a strategy that can
> cost them market share.
I worked at Intel for a few years and I can tell you that Intel
does not like pushed around by Microsoft just like everyone else.
There are times that my group would have to head down a certain
direction simply b/c that was what kept M$ the happiest. Linux
allows the HW vendors (if they play nicely) to be in much more
control of the direction they head in and provide input directly
to the OS developers to best support their HW. Add the fact that
Linux has gained such market penetration, and it makes a lot of
sense to me.
~Deepak
--
Deepak Saxena -
dsaxena@plexity.net
(text/plain)