Copying kernels WAS SuSE 9.0: The Good and the Bad

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date:  
Subject: Copying kernels WAS SuSE 9.0: The Good and the Bad
> On Nov 2, 2003, at 12:17 AM, Robert Wultsch wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to copy the kernel and all the moudules from my
> > suse install to a outside medium, and then install debian and copy
> > over the kernel? I *hate* the way that suse is setup for dealing with
> > packages. Debian and Windows are so simple (usally) for new software
> > that I have become jaded to having to fight with a os. There is no
> > reason that I should be in rpm hell just to get msn updated to the
> > latest version so I can use msn messanger.
>
> Why not just install Debian and upgrade the kernel? I thought the
> Debian philosophy was to make fewer releases in the interest of
> stability and then let the users upgrade to the latest stuff as they
> need it. I know on the PPC side upgrading to a recent BenH kernel is
> just part of the install on machines new enough to actually be
> shipping. Going to the Debian site and DLing a current enough version
> of YaBoot to actually access the Debian CD is another part of the
> ritual.
>
> Come to think of it, the easiest way to install Debian, at least on PPC
> systems, is to install another Linux and then install Debian over it.
> It has always bothered me a little that Debian is such a cannibal.


I am not sure what you are suggesting. It is my intention, to install debian
and then upgrade to the SuSE kernel.

I have not been succesful at compiling a kernel for x86 since like 2.4.10 when
I just begining to play. There are way to many options for me to not screw it
up for my laptop. (this is not to say that I have not been succesful on the
sparc platform, which I have) With the SuSE kernel I know that it works, but
I hate most everything else.