I'm kinda leaning toward Sun's Java. The IDE (netbeans) is good, and the
install process of both the JSDK and the IDE are very painless. I
wouldn't want to install Sun's without offering and explaining the
alternative, but I stick to the 'official' java.
I'm going on a limb, but i'm assuming that all the classes at our
universities and community colleges are using Sun's. I'd rather show
people how the Linux OS offers people Choices, not just
ideology-compatible alternatives. The ability to take the work from a a
Window's machine and gracefully transition to a Linux station is very
powerful.
Which is why I love OpenOffice :)
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 10:31, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> der.hans said:
> > Am 07. Oct, 2003 schwätzte liberty young so:
> >
> >> Which Java? Personally, I would rather install on upcoming developer's
> >
> > Whichever one is listed on apt-get.org :).
> >
> > I generally hear good things about the JDK from IBM. For java devel we
> > might want to install the IDE from IBM. If so, we should probably
> > install IBM's JVM.
>
> We should be supporting Blackdown. There are other ones on apt-get.org
> that are not nearly as careful about trying to keep a clean
> implementation.
>
> -Derek
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)