Author: Craig White Date: Subject: Installfest menu - last chance to review
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 17:42, der.hans wrote: > Am 07. Oct, 2003 schwätzte Alan Dayley so:
>
> > lynx is correct, if what we are talking about is the text based web
> > browser. BTW, lynx is not installed by the Red Hat Linux default
> > installer. I believe it is on the CDs, though. I don't know about the
> > other distros. I always just download it when I need it.
>
> links is also a text-based browser, but far more capable than lyxn and
> generally better. Last I used it for testing web devel it had probs with
> caching. Otherwise it rocks over lynx.
>
> I'm in favor of installing both, actually :).
> ----
IIRC - they had different capabilities when it came to handling frames
and ssl - I don't recall if links could do ssl at all.