Am 25. Sep, 2003 schw=E4tzte keith smith so:
> I don't get it. What real R&D is there for a distribution? At $40.00
> retail RH gets about $20.00. A few $ for a box and a few disks and a
> small manual. Maybe $5.00 in direct cost.
There's a lot of R&D. I'm certain they pay Alan Cox quite well :).
There's also packaging and testing.
Creating a distro is time intensive. If you're paying people for the time
their working it's also money intensive.
> Most of the real production is free. M$ made millions+++++ selling DOS
> for $30.00 a pop.
m$ didn't need to deal with hundreds of types of video cards and they didn'=
t
know what a network card is until almost the end of 1995 :). There's also
that thing about being a monopoly...
> Look at the Debian model. A good distribution. Package management is
> its selling point. It is not nicely packaged, however it is good....
> if you have some understanding of how to configure it. Debian is not
> commercial. I don'tknow a single person that has paid for Debian, Yet The=
y
> Survive....
debian rocks, but debian isn't paying the developers. I think it's a good
example of how things can work. Gentoo is doing the same thing.
>From my limited knowledge of Linux, I feel relatively confident that with
>$5000.00 worth of equipment, a DSL connection and two other fellas, we
>could product a nice distribution of Linux that would be somewhat easy to
>install and comprehensive.
Knoppix is proof that this can happen. Maintenance and upgradability,
however, don't scale near that well.
Free Software is in better shape than non-Free Software, but there's still =
a
significant amount of work.
ciao,
der.hans
--=20
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.AZOTO.org/
# Hope has two beautiful daughters: Anger and Courage. Anger at the way
# things are, and Courage to struggle to create things as they should be.
# -- St. Augustine
(text/plain)