Am 13. Sep, 2003 schw=E4tzte Rob Wultsch so:
> Exception IMHO should be made for everyone for office applications, I
> think that those in stable are rather long in the tooth.
1.1 is backported to woody, but not in testing :).
> From what I have read about Gnome 2.4 on slashdot it sounds buggy at
> this point.
Well, they've got 5 weeks to fix it. Break out the whips... ;-)
> IMHO unstable is far more stable and bug free than any Windows
> enviroment, though there are a very fews issues. For servers itwould
I would agree, but the upgrade path requires some expert knowledge, so I
think it's something best avoided for newbies.
> also have security issues that computers maintainer would have to deal
> with. But for desktops I think that stable is inappropriate as most of
> the software is rather dated.
stable is fine for most people, if we get some important backports,
especially X. We need to decide which backports, though.
ciao,
der.hans
--=20
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.AZOTO.org/
# When you are tired of choosing the lesser of two evils,
# Vote Cthulhu for President!
(text/plain)