Am 11. Aug, 2003 schw=E4tzte Bill Jonas so:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 10:25:10PM -0700, der.hans wrote:
> > Do you mean s/not// on that sentence?
>
> I believe he was asking, "Why is having the sbin directories in your
> path not a security risk?" I'll field this one. ;-)
>
> The bin/sbin distinction is based on the theory that the bin directories
> should contain software that is useful for everyone, and the sbin
> directories should contain software that is useful only for
> administrators. In practice, most of the software in the sbin
> directories is useful for troubleshooting and is therefore useful for
> most everyone, assuming the user is familiar with the operation of the
> software.
There's that. There's also the theory that everything in /sbin should be
staticly compiled and that /sbin should contain all of the tools you need t=
o
recover the system should it get hosed.
I wish we had staticly compiled executables in /sbin.
ciao,
der.hans
--=20
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.AZOTO.org/
# Your email is being read by hundreds of uptight agents
# who never saw the humor in Dr. Strangelove. -- Mark Russell
(text/plain)