Eric,
If you haven't gotten any resonse to this I would like to review the
material that you have written. The defense to libel is that truth is
not libelous (sp?). At any rate, I might be willing to hang a vhost on
my box until my ISP gets a notice ;)
Eric Lee Green wrote:
> This morning my ISP called me and said they'd gotten a nastygram from lawyers
> about my site http://evidence-eliminator-sucks.com , which details (well,
> detailed) the true story of the whackiest bunch of spammer scammers on the
> Internet. This letter threatened to file a lawsuit in England against them
> for "aiding and abetting libel" if they did not immediately remove the site
> from the Internet. Unfortunately, a) my ISP is a small local business that
> doesn't have a stable of trained attack lawyers on staff, and b) they do have
> operations in England and thus can't afford to ignore the threat of an
> English lawsuit, no matter how unfounded. So while they love spammers about as
> much as the rest of us do, they could not afford to keep my site up and
> going.
>
> So right now I'm looking for someone who can host the site a) cheaply (free
> would be great!), and b) who doesn't have operations in England, and c) hates
> spam enough to ignore nastygrams from spammers threatening to sue them in
> England (heh). I'd appreciate any help I could get there especially from
> anti-spam activists, who surely have faced the same problem
> (spammers threatening libel lawsuits because we call them spammers, sigh).
> Anyone have some workable solutions? (The site is a flat HTML site, mostly
> with a few images, only a couple of which are large and none of which are on
> the front page, about the only special thing is that I need PHP or some other
> CGI method for a demonstration page where I show how they do one of their
> scams).
>
> This has *NOT* been a good month for me, between my employer laying off their
> entire U.S. staff, and now this :-(.
>
(text/plain)