--B4IIlcmfBL/1gGOG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:21:27PM -0700, Eric Thelin wrote:
> It was submitted to slashdot and here by a co-worker of mine. He is
> angry because cox is not only blocking port 25 but also adding relay
> filters to only allow email sent with the from address set to use your
> cox.net address. So he can't send out emails from his personal domain
> or a domain used for a home based business in any way except web mail
> that avoids smtp until off of the cox network.
I cannot see what benefits I would gain from running my own SMTP
server, but that doesn't mean there are none.
However, I do not use the cox.net email account. As you may have
noticed, I use the fantastic fastmail.fm[1] service and would prefer
to receive mail there. I would think that this situation would be
fairly common (e.g., hotmail, yahoo, etc.).
Oh, well. If it is truly bad for the customer, I hope that Cox
realizes the error of their ways.
[1] Being such a fantastic email service, they offer SMTP services on
ports 25 and 26, as well as an SSL authentication on port 465.
However, I would still prefer to send my email through the closest
possible server as opposed to routing everything through New York.
--=20
Voltage Spike
,,,
(. .)
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--
--B4IIlcmfBL/1gGOG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+76alpNoctRtUIRQRAji+AKCGcsfZfsFsxl6TbjGoO+u+eXKOYQCeN0AC
9RmGRzwtVfmDlNnSxcP8Pho=
=u1/U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--B4IIlcmfBL/1gGOG--
(text/plain)