Digital Signing

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Voltage Spike
Date:  
Subject: Digital Signing
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 04:59 PM, Shawn Rutledge wrote:

> Is there any opportunity for reuse of keys, between SSL, SSH, PGP,
> Kerberos,
> etc?


I don't think that this would make sense? From my understanding, SSH,
SSL, and probably Kerberos use much shorter keys than PGP-style keys
due to the real-time nature of the transaction. It is not
computationally feasible to encrypt and decrypt data in real-time with
a 1024-bit or higher key. (Also, I believe that Kerberos uses a
different type of key system.)

Of course, I suppose that it could be handled like IPSEC. In other
words, use the extreme key-pair to validate the user at each end and
encrypt the "lesser" key (which may be randomly generated) to send
across for real-time communication. As far as I know, however, SSL is
already considered secure for some time to come.

- -- 
                                                            Voltage Spike
       ,,,
      (. .)
- --ooO-(_)-Ooo--