More coal on the fire

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Darrell Shandrow
Date:  
Subject: More coal on the fire
Hi Alan,

Agreed! I am in fact a big Linux advocate, at least for the server side of
the house. For the client side, I'm still a bit of a Windows advocate.
That is probably mostly because I have a solid screen access solution for
Windows. We'll see what happens with Gnopernicus access to the Gnome GUI.

Thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Dayley" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: More coal on the fire


> I also have found that Open Office is not perfect, with DOC or XLS files.
> Things out of the ordinary, like odd input boxes or lesser used math
> functions do not translate that well.
>
> On the other hand, the developers are to be commended for doing as well as
> they have in getting a program to mostly work with a proprietary and

closed
> format. I would not want the task of reverse engineering the MS DOC

format!
> I've done stuff like that before but not with a format that complex.
>
> Alan
>
> On Monday 16 September 2002 07:55 pm, Darrell Shandrow wrote:
> > Hi Fred,
> >
> > Unfortunately, I am not quite convinced with respect to Open Office.

Some
> > of my colleagues have sent me Open Office documents which have been
> > converted to Microsoft Word format, and they have lacked some structural
> > elements which they would have contained if they had been created using
> > Microsoft Word. I am a blind person, and document accessibility to

screen
> > readers is paramount. At this time, when it comes to accessibility, MS

has
> > it all over Sun. Currently, even the Windows version of Open Office

isn't
> > accessible to screen readers.
> >
> >    Thanks.

>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss