I'm sure there is someone here more knowledgeable about this than I am,
but if I remember correctly from my MCSE courses, you really don't need
NTFS for a typical user. The new NTFS has a lot of security goodies
(very fine-grained permissions, etc.), but the average user will
probably never use them. And I think that if the user ever decides to
dual boot with Linux, he'll have a much easier time trying to write to a
FAT32 partition than an NTFS partition.
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 17:43, Nathan England wrote:
> >
> I was building a new machine for a custmer today and they
> wanted XP installed. I formatted the drive ahead of time with
> fat32, then XP only offered to format NTFS or leave the
> partition alone. So I want anyone's opinion on this.
> I heard that NTFS is newer than that used in NT and has
> performance modifications. Does anyone know the benefits of
> using NTFS with XP home on a typical users machine? Or is
> fat32 still better? Do the security advances outweigh being
> able to boot off a floppy and recover data?
>
> - --
>
>
>
> Nathan England
> plug@the-arcanum.org
>
> "A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular"
> --Adlai Stevenson
> >
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)