Technically they have been found in violation of Anti-trust laws. People use
the term "monoply" with them as propgaganda...
----- Original Message -----
From: "der.hans" <
PLUGd@LuftHans.com>
To: <
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: Palladium : The cure for Independence
> Am 04. Jul, 2002 schwätzte bob smith so:
>
> > >Ok why don't we try something new...... *Lets just
> > >say in the end* (keep in mind this is a gigantic IF)
> > >if Bill Gates overcomes unix and gets a way to
> > >legally monopolize everything.
> >
> > err monopolies are illegal dude. I'm no lawyer, but
> > I'm pretty sure you can't have a legal monopoly.
>
> That's what I used to think. We were wrong. Microsoft had a legal
monopoly,
> but they engaged in illegal anti-competitive activities to protect the
> monopoly, which is how they came up against the anti-trust laws.
>
> I don't know if they've been found to have an illegal monopoly.
>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans
> --
> # https://www.LuftHans.com/
> # I've got a photographic memory,
> # but I'm lousy photographer. - der.hans
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss