I can use csh but I prefer bash, all the features of csh for the most
part and more. Unless I am debugging someones csh scripts I use bash
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:14,
lynn.newton@cox.net wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'd like to take a brief survey. I'm in process of desigining, writing, and revising some courseware for Cisco Networking Academy, to make it far more Linux-oriented. It used to be heavily Solaris slanted because it was created under a partnership with Sun.
>
> My question briefly is this: How many of you all use csh on a regular basis, as opposed to bash, ksh, or one of the others provided? csh is provided by default (at least in RH), but possibly because my background and the environment I did most of my work in for many years was all AT&T SysV and then AIX oriented, I tend to think that very few of the Linux users I know actually use and prefer csh, unless they came from a Solaris environment originally. But perhaps that's just my biased slant on things.
>
> I'd like to have your opinions on this, so I don't make any ill-founded recommendations. (I'm planning on recommending they cut out the part on csh in their introductory shell chapters.)
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)