\_ SMTP quoth
lynn.newton@cox.net on 3/21/2002 13:14 as having spake thusly:
\_
\_ Greetings,
\_
\_ I'd like to take a brief survey. I'm in process of desigining, writing, and revising some courseware for Cisco Networking Academy, to make it far more Linux-oriented. It used to be heavily Solaris slanted because it was created under a partnership with Sun.
\_
\_ My question briefly is this: How many of you all use csh on a
\_ regular basis, as opposed to bash, ksh, or one of the others
\_ provided?
I'll vote for csh. Technically, I'm using tcsh, but it's right
close. Although I've farted around with the perlshell and just found
a link off to eshell, tcsh is grandfathered in since back in '88 when
it was either csh or sh, and there was a vast difference in
usability.
\_ I'd like to have your opinions on this, so I don't make any
\_ ill-founded recommendations. (I'm planning on recommending they cut
\_ out the part on csh in their introductory shell chapters.)
Depending on space, I'd leave it in. It'll help someone someplace
notice that 'hey, this isn't bash, and I recognize it'. Of course,
then they'll go ahead and type bash at the csh prompt....
David
(text/plain)