I have had expierence with the following:
Compaq : Most things not supported real well, though with newer kernels
not bad. Somewhat expensive, but nice box.
Toshiba : Everything supported out of box. Decent laptop but a little
big.
Dell : Everything supported out of box. Decent laptop, not commercial
grade IMHO, I have had it serviced 5 times at least, but I am VERY hard on
laptops.
IBM : Only expierence was older thinkpads. Best laptops wrt durability,
but very pricey. At time they had spotty linux support but Im sure that
its gotten much better.
TuxTops: Great, durable machine, very expensive, not in business anylonger
but someone took over their product line.
-Derek
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, David Mandala wrote:
> Need more input....... What are you looking for? A lightweight mini or a
> desktop replacement, or something in between?
>
> Try the laptop reference page http://www.linux-laptop.net/ which lists lots
> and lots of laptops and how well linux installed on them.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Furmanek, Greg [mailto:Greg.Furmanek@hit.cendant.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:04 AM
> > To: PLUG (E-mail)
> > Subject: Laptop for Linux
> >
> >
> > What are the recommendations?
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a
> > little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> > - Benjamin Franklin
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > "The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments
> > were free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious
> > code when sent. This message and its attachments could have
> > been infected during transmission. By reading the message
> > and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
> > responsibility for taking protective and remedial action
> > about viruses and other defects. The sender's employer is
> > not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from
> > this message or its attachments."
> >
>