Am 02. Jul, 2001 schwäzte Blake Barnett so:
> But if you have lsb-package-0.0-i386.rpm and package_0.0-2.deb, the two
> systems aren't going to know it.
I think the deb can Provides whatever the lsb provides, so no need for the
lsb rpm. In fact, there'd probably be a Conflicts in the deb.
In order to be compliant debian still needs to provide rpms, though. Hmm,
could we rpm a deb? ;-)
ciao,
der.hans
--
#
der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/
www.DevelopOnline.com
# "... the social skills of a cow on acid." - der.hans
(text/plain)