Am 02. Jul, 2001 schwäzte Blake Barnett so:

> But if you have lsb-package-0.0-i386.rpm and package_0.0-2.deb, the two
> systems aren't going to know it.

I think the deb can Provides whatever the lsb provides, so no need for the
lsb rpm. In fact, there'd probably be a Conflicts in the deb.

In order to be compliant debian still needs to provide rpms, though. Hmm,
could we rpm a deb? ;-)

ciao,

der.hans
-- 
# der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/ www.DevelopOnline.com
#  "... the social skills of a cow on acid." - der.hans