I dont see this as being a problem. If a company gives money to plug.. or
more specifically give money to the NPO stating that this money is for plug.
Then the money is for plug to decide what to do with. They would just have
to stick with any prerequisites that the NPO or the money donor comes up
with.
Am I wrong?
Brian
----- Original Message -----
> The very reason that you see them having seperate goals is why I think
> we need to have separate NPO's I mean I'm sure *most* of the time we'll
> be in agreement. But if company X gives money to PLUG then the NPO
> disagrees on using that money for something PLUG agrees on. We'll have a
> problem. I'd rather we didn't have to deal with that. Setting up a NPO
> for Plug would allow companies to give directly to PLUG. Or if they want
> more bang for their buck they can give to the Superset group NPO. But
> Plug would have its on budgit to do its own things with. I do agree that
> it makes twice as much paperwork though.
>
> Carl P.
>
> Jim wrote:
>
> >Because that is a job for PLUG. PLUG needs to be doing a better job of
> >promoting itself. Why hasnt it? Maybe because no one has offered to
help
> >promote PLUG.
> >
> >The NPO will promote PLUG and all the other LUGs in Az. It will
primarily
> >focus on educating the masses, but it will also be a resource for
support.
> > LUGs are a great source of both source and community.
> >
> >On Monday 11 June 2001 10:20, you wrote:
> >
> >><rant>
> >>How about none of these and instead of doing some completely insane
> >>over the top NPO that try's to cover every aspect of free software
> >>in AZ, we focus on just keeping the local Linux community growing?
> >>
> >>I mean, I run into people in over town who've been running Linux
> >>for years and don't know about PLUG's existence.
> >></rant>
> >>
> >>~Deepak
> >>
> >>On Jun 10 2001, at 20:13, Kimi Adams was caught saying:
> >>
> >>>As promised, here are the names that have been mentioned most in the
> >>>past few days. Sorry that it's a little later in the day that
> >>>expected.
> >>>
> >>>Please vote appropriately one last time to
> >>>npo@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us so that it can be tracked. Final voting
> >>>must be done by Tuesday. Please tell everyone that you know to view
> >>>this listing and vote for one of these names. Remember that the name
> >>>should really make sense but one that is memorable will stick. Speak
> >>>them aloud several times to see if one makes more sense than another.
> >>>
> >>>Freedom Arizona
> >>>Arizona Open Technology Association
> >>>Unfettered Software of Arizona
> >>>Open Technology Advocacy Society of Arizona (OTASA)
> >>>Association for Sane Software
> >>>Arizona Alternative Software Advocates
> >>>
> >>>Cross your fingers...............
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Kimi
> >>>________________________________________________
> >>>See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail
> >>>doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >>>
> >>>PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> >>>http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >>>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)