Trent Shipley wrote:
> (Unfortunately, my understanding is that in XML an 'id' MUST be unique. I
> don't think XML would support the implied scoping for name resolution
> implied by this scheme. If so, its too bad.)
Untrue. Any attribute can be defined as unique by a DTD, it doesn't
have to be named ID.
--
Tom Bradford --- The dbXML Project ---
http://www.dbxml.org/
We store your XML data a hell of a lot better than /dev/null