Trent Shipley wrote:
> (Unfortunately, my understanding is that in XML an 'id' MUST be unique.  I
> don't think XML would support the implied scoping for name resolution
> implied by this scheme.  If so, its too bad.)

Untrue.  Any attribute can be defined as unique by a DTD, it doesn't
have to be named ID.

-- 
Tom Bradford --- The dbXML Project --- http://www.dbxml.org/
We store your XML data a hell of a lot better than /dev/null