I mean something else.
The modifications were in the installed packages.
instead of installing the gcc rpms from redhat,
I installed alternate (and cleaner) packages from rufus.w3.org.
Also, I went with the alternate packages when it came to gcc/glibc
and the libc libraries. I installed the GNU versions as opposed
to the default ones that came with redhat... things definitely run
smoother and I don't have to worry about lots of breakages.
I haven't checked for a new updates in the gcc/glibc/libc line
yet..... redhat is just not stable on that point yet fro me to trust
their version of the compiler.
Hawke
Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> Thanks for the referral! I will check these out.
>
> When you say RedHat 7 with modifications - do you mean the long list of
> "errata" patches found on the RedHat site, or something else?
>
> Mark
>
--
Make a few extra $$$.
Join
http://www.processtree.com/?sponsor=29027
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or
numbered!
My life is my own - No. 6
(text/plain)