On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:13:37PM -0700,
plug@arcticmail.com wrote:
>
> I understand the mutt geek's argument: We're an
> MUA, not an MTA, and well-written MTAs are a PITA.
>
> So for mutt I installed qmail as an MTA. I just have
> qmail configured to relay everything to a "smart" host.
>
> Overkill? Ja, but mutt rocks, qmail rocks, FreeBSD
> rocks, and Debian Linux rocks.
>
>
Actually, configuring exim with eximconfig was quite easy, and now I don't
have to worry about using SMTP-capable mail clients.
Makes life a little easier in the end. ;-)
My only problem with Mutt so far is PGP/MIME. What the hell is it, and
why should I care? Now, I have to run my mail through procmail in order
for mutt to recognize normal PGP mail, and I can't use mutt's built-in PGP
support if I want non-MIME users to be able to read my mail.
- --
Nathan Saper
natedog@well.com (PGP OK)
Fingerprint (0x9AD0F382): 743D FE2C 7F2E 7CAE 4A5F 0B19 D855 B205 9AD0 F382
Fidonet: 1:114/59.10
(text/plain)