-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:13:37PM -0700, plug@arcticmail.com wrote:
> 
> I understand the mutt geek's argument:  We're an
> MUA, not an MTA, and well-written MTAs are a PITA.
> 
> So for mutt I installed qmail as an MTA.  I just have
> qmail configured to relay everything to a "smart" host.
> 
> Overkill?  Ja, but mutt rocks, qmail rocks, FreeBSD
> rocks, and Debian Linux rocks.
> 
> 

Actually, configuring exim with eximconfig was quite easy, and now I don't
have to worry about using SMTP-capable mail clients.

Makes life a little easier in the end. ;-)

My only problem with Mutt so far is PGP/MIME.  What the hell is it, and
why should I care?  Now, I have to run my mail through procmail in order
for mutt to recognize normal PGP mail, and I can't use mutt's built-in PGP
support if I want non-MIME users to be able to read my mail.

- --
Nathan Saper
natedog@well.com (PGP OK)
Fingerprint (0x9AD0F382): 743D FE2C 7F2E 7CAE 4A5F 0B19 D855 B205 9AD0 F382
Fidonet: 1:114/59.10
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5vsnX2FWyBZrQ84IRAr7AAJ9ZYCjkgrxLQv1el3G2Z18VQTzeDACdFk7w
OTC+5m6lI3t0wRB4Whx3IZ4=
=jZZt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----