My crusade for web content filtering

That depends entirely on what your definition of "is" is.


D

* On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 01:12:20AM -0700, Brian Cluff wrote:
> > Because proving you are right in a court of law costs money.
> > To prove that UUMCUINT is a Cracker Haven[tm] takes more money
> > than I have.
> > The 1st Amendment is about Free Speach, not Free Legal Counsel.
> > Please look up SLAPP in any legal dictionary/site.
>
> Yeah, unfortunatly in todays times, I'm afraid your right. You can't just
> walk into court with incrimination evidence and say here, and you are found
> in the right. You end up getting people nit picking and doing endruns
> around your evidence like OJ and Clinton. They would probably get off
> because that didn't fit their understanding of definition of cracking.
[snip]