OSS In the Office

[Jim]

--=-jN55ViVp5dQWvi6gocfr
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 12:51, Austin Godber wrote:
>=20
> I should make clear that the analysis was not mine.  I just thought that=20
> it was probably true and wanted to get some opinions.  Riding my bike in=20
> to school today I thought ... wait, doesn't a EULA remove this liability=20
> for the software vendor?  So you have people buying commercial software=20
> for the sole purpose of being able to place blame, while at the same=20
> time all blame is being shed by the software company via the EULA.  I=20
> imagine that sfotware vendors and companies pen other agreements, but is=20
> there really any case for accountability?
>=20
> Austin
>=20

Shhhhh....dont let their dirty little secret out. Austin!  What would
all those managers do if their bossed knew that proprietary licensing
terms absolve the vendor of all responsibility, past, present, and
future?

>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>=20
>=20
--=20
 Jim

 Freedom is all we really want

--=-jN55ViVp5dQWvi6gocfr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+nbaXchsi2tkkdN4RAj26AJ4inhv2AmcQ99nmGzQPSFhp0jO8fwCfXn5Z
ranumOGpkjtoC0wgulyLChk=
=/FDJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-jN55ViVp5dQWvi6gocfr--