Is there a Security Meeting tonight? What is the subject?
> On Sep 10, 2017, at 12:00 PM, plug-discuss-request@lists.phxlinux.org wrote:
>
> Send PLUG-discuss mailing list submissions to
> plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> plug-discuss-request@lists.phxlinux.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> plug-discuss-owner@lists.phxlinux.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of PLUG-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: what sort of use cases/memory_needs/etc (was RE:
> Warranty!!?!?!?!?!) (Michael Butash)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 15:04:39 -0700
> From: Michael Butash <michael@butash.net>
> To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org>
> Subject: Re: what sort of use cases/memory_needs/etc (was RE:
> Warranty!!?!?!?!?!)
> Message-ID:
> <CADWnDstXR=eNVds9Z4F_s9m=pUXPusmAk5FJ9Gxb0ZYfF0OMKQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On the note of memory, I get home after being on the road for a while
> (1mo), and notice my desktop is wonky, refresh issues, but works. I find
> Cinnamon consuming some 91g of my ram now. Funny how that works, guess
> time to upgrade arch finally.
>
> Most days I wish compositing in desktops would go away, it is more trouble
> than it is worth.
>
> -mb
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Aaron Jones <retro64xyz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I run i3wm, luakit, discord, dropbox, and owncloud. Sometimes cmus, mutt,
>> or firebird.
>>
>> I use about 5.9gb of my 32gb ram during normal usage. I don't keep more
>> than 3 to 5 tabs open on average in luakit.
>>
>> Things don't usually pop off until I start using my system for work.
>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Matt Graham <mhgraham@crow202.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2017-09-06 13:48, Carruth, Rusty wrote:
>>>> So, I'm impressed by the memory/cpu load that Mr Graham has on his
>>>> computer. And I thought I was a hog... er, I mean heavy resource
>>>> user!
>>>
>>> It's *usually* not that bad/high. Building one particular Android
>> project causes this older machine (16G, 2 core i5, 500G SSD), to be almost
>> unusable for as long as it takes all the java to compile/link/build.
>> Ordinary Android projects and standard browsing, mail clients, apache, and
>> so forth run fine. I don't know what precisely they did to make that
>> project be an enormous hog. It's not even particularly complicated.
>>>
>>>> But I agree with him that 16G is getting close to the minimum
>>>> required amount if you do much web browsing with lots of tabs (Ok, he
>>>> didn't exactly say that, but it was implied)
>>>
>>> I probably have fewer tabs open than almost anyone. 9-15 usually.
>>>
>>> Steve Litt wrote:
>>>> Firefox is a total pig. Most other browsers tie up much less
>>>> resources, especially with a lot of open tabs, especially with
>>>> challenging javascript encumbered sites.
>>>> Also, IMHO when you start to see your browser(s) run slowly, it's
>>>> time to start closing tabs. If you have a tab that you're for sure
>>>> going to have to have later, bookmark it.
>>>
>>> Yes, pretty much. I find that closing tabs helps, but firefox is a
>> collection of code parts written by the lowest bidder and flying in
>> extremely close formation around a memory leak. I try to restart it every
>> day, which seems to work. And I'd guess that people use tabs instead of
>> bookmarks because they retain approximately where you were on a page (good
>> for really long pages), and there's less commitment.
>>>
>>> Aaron Jones wrote:
>>>> Minimum 32gb ddr4 checking in. [...] thanks to bloat and Lennart
>>>> Poettering, I now need 32gb of ram, 8 cores, and a multi terrabyte
>>>> ssd just to be effective. The future is here ladies and gents...
>>>> and it is gloriously unoptimized.
>>>
>>> Modern programmers don't seem to care about optimizing things.
>> Curiously enough, KDE 5 is fairly snappy for me on a machine with only 8G.
>> Opening a link with gwenview in a dir that contained 17000 links to other
>> images pegged the CPU for a while as it generated thumbnails for all the
>> links and preloaded a bunch of them. I'm not sure how often people do that
>> sort of thing--it was more of a "what happens if I stress this program out
>> a lot?" than anything.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress
>>> There is no Darkness in Eternity
>>> But only Light too dim for us to see.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.phxlinux.org/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20170909/2eb9a9a6/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of PLUG-discuss Digest, Vol 147, Issue 8
> ********************************************
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)