OT: remember

Charles Jones charles.jones at ciscolearning.org
Thu Sep 11 20:54:26 MST 2008


Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 18:53 -0700, Charles Jones wrote:
>   
>> Craig White wrote:
>>     
>>> there are documented moments when such acts (killing innocent American
>>> civilians on American soil) were actually contemplated by members of our
>>> own government...
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
>>>   
>>>       
>> The Northwoods "plan", while indeed ludicrous, was purely deception. It 
>> involved NO KILLING WHATSOEVER.  This elaborate play is a far cry from 
>> outright killing thousands of people, destroying buildings, and somehow 
>> involving and coordinating thousands of others in a plot and 
>> successfully keeping it secret.
>>
>> Was this plan rediculous? Yes. Did it involve killing innocent people, 
>> or even enemies? No.  Could 9-11 be just a more "hardcore" version of 
>> this plan? Anything is possible, but I have a hard time believing that 
>> the govt would be capable of pulling off such an complex plan, involving 
>> so many people.
>>     
> ----
> the second sentence in the link above says otherwise...perhaps you need
> to fix the wikipedia entry since you obviously know more.
>   
It does indeed: "The plan called for CIA 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency> or other 
operatives to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. 
cities to create public support for a war against Castro 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidel_Castro>-led Cuba 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba>.".  Consider that sentence was 
written by the person who made the article, so there is no need to take 
that sentence as evidence of what the plan was. The /actual plan/, 
(which is an actual document, and not just some offhand statement made 
by someone on the internet), clearly depicts using deception but no 
actual killing. :P
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20080911/2cc86419/attachment.htm 


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list