PLUG netiquette (was trolls flamefest)

[Alan Dayley]

Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/29/07, *keith smith* <klsmith2020 at yahoo.com
> <mailto:klsmith2020 at yahoo.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Add PLUG reserves the right to suspend or remove any account not in
>     compliance. 
> 
> 
> 
>   And for my reference, WHO is PLUG?

Straight to the point.  WE are PLUG.

There is a Steering Committee with a chair person but, they direct the
group in a "benevolent dictator" style, sort of...  The committee does
makes sure stuff happens but has no real force of control.  There are no
by-laws or hard rules for the committee to lean on or point at.  PLUG
members follow or don't or grumble or yell as they see fit.

So, your point is taken.  If anyone is reserving the right to ban
someone, who has that right and what are the criteria?  I don't know the
answer to that question.

Better yet, I don't want to need to know the answer to that question.

In the history of PLUG that I know, no one has ever been banned.  Ever.
 I'd much rather continue as it has all these years.  Self policing
works and this group is very good at it.

I, for one, would not want the power to ban anyone.

Alan


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20070829/730ed5aa/attachment.pgp