OT: C and C++

[Dazed_75]

I would also add that although C was purely DESIGNED as procedural, a lot of
us back then began doing object oriented programming within C.  Would have
been a lot easier with C++ but we did not have it then.  The concepts
existed and had implementations in other languages, but for a C programmer
with existing code it just did not pay to switch languages with C++ coming.


Perhaps that is one reason I sat on the ANSII X3J11 committee for 2 years.
Tore me up when I had to quit due to my workload.  Wish I could remember all
that stuff now days.

On 11/27/06, Micah DesJardins <micahdj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The only thing I would add to Ted's answer is that C++ adds support
> for object oriented programming. C has no concept of classes,
> instances, methods etc.  It is pure procedural programming.  OO
> programming gets all the press these days, but a lot of your favorite
> open source projects are written in good old fashioned C.  (For speed,
> portability or historical reasons)
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>



-- 
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter
and those who matter don't mind.  - Dr. Seuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20061128/771509b6/attachment.htm