OT: Hands Off Google!
der.hans
PLUGd at LuftHans.com
Thu Feb 9 14:29:42 MST 2006
Am 09. Feb, 2006 schwätzte Joshua Zeidner so:
>> Still essentially the same non-.cn results for US search at Google.com.
>
>
>
> thats wierd! when I click the Tiananmen in .cn I get 'super happy fun'
> pictures, when I click on .com I get tanks with students, etc.
You allow cookies from Google?
> These problems are surely the beginning of much bigger ones in the
> future. One can imagine the number of ways that a search company could
> control a group or society through an engine that users assume is impartial
It's an extention of the debate on self-publication vs. having to go
through established publication outlets. The search engines are becoming
a necessary advertising/marketing outlet.
> and objective. I would think that eventually there will be government
> regulations on search engines, in addition to new regulations introduced at
There already are to some extent. Search engines, ISPs, etc. have been
able to duck it a little by saying it's not feasable to filter data. It's
becoming feasable. Dunno what they'll say then...
> the IP transport level as well. This of course would require a much higher
Do you mean gov't regs or that the IP proto will change?
> level of formalization in the information and linguistic sciences. There is
> a growing contingency of tech savvy activists who are vehemently fighting
> this encroachment into thier digital communication infrastructure.
> http://www.eff.org . There is Lessig of course, and a few other important
> lawyers and technology people. I had mentioned on the Azipa list more than
> a year ago the problems concerning municipal wireless and how hidden cost
> structures will effect their success. Verizon has since 'put on a happy
> face' and are now ostensibly more positive about the prospects( and sales
> value ) of a 'neutral network'. It seems more like bait than an honest
> sales bid.
Didn't know Verizon is involved. So much for being able to use bluetooth
devices...
> In general most people do not understand to what extent this indexing of
> content can be used. Natural Language Processing has made some serious
> strides in recent years. It cetainly touches on a lot of hot topics such as
> privacy, etc.
They don't understand and don't care. The latter leads to the former.
ciao,
der.hans
--
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.CiscoLearning.org/
# Join the League of Professional System Administrators! https://LOPSA.org/
# Stell dir vor, es ist Krieg und keiner geht hin...
More information about the PLUG-discuss
mailing list