Lindows
Ed Skinner
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:22:07 -0700
On Friday 04 April 2003 17:06, Kyle Faber wrote:
> I have never used it, but I was just asked to investigate Lindows as a
> desktop replacement for every position here at the office from CEO to
> Secretary.
>
> I have never used it. Any thoughts?
I would have two concerns, one major, one minor.
My major concern would be using the default Lindows configuration which
runs the user as 'root'. A really bad, bad idea that leaves the system in an
extremely vulnerable state. But I'm also told that this can be changed so
that normal users run as normal Linux users. If you do that, I'd say the
major problem is fixed.
The minor problem is that your company will have to pay for Lindows
itself and for the subscription that enables upgrades. If your system
administrators could be a little more savvy, everyone could be running RedHat
(without a fee, legally). Upgrades would have to be handled through the
system administrators but, hey, isn't that what they do now anyway?
I ran Lindows here at home on my wife's machine (the $200 cheapie from
WalMart) for a couple of months. But ultimately I decided that RedHat would
be essentially the same for her, RedHat came with more utilities and tools,
and it didn't default to running everyone as root. I upgraded the system to
RedHat and, after a five minute introduction, my wife was off and running and
just as happy. That was several months ago.
Last week we had lunch with a still-using-Microsoft person who was
complaining about his latest crash and the terrible technical support he got
from AOL [from India!]. Without any coaching my wife commented, "You know I
just realized I haven't rebooted Linux. Ever!"
My recommendation would be to sound like you're saying yes to Lindows but
suggest an even lower-cost alternative that has all the pluses and fixes all
the minuses: RedHat.
--
Ed Skinner, ed@flat5.net, http://www.flat5.net/