win2k 65k errors

[D. Taylor]

> and mot is bringing in new machines, just trying to decide what os to put
> on them. 

FreeBSD.  :)


Well Rooster, *ACTUALLY*, I was at Fry's the other day,
I looked *AT THE BOX*, and THE BOX said 32M *minimum*,
64M *recommended*.

After chuckling at that, I then read the rest of the
box.  It went something like

Building on the reliability and security of NT...

At that point, my chuckling turned into uncontrollable
laughter and I passed out from the lack of oxygen.  When
I came to, there were ten white shirts hovering over me.


D

On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Rooster wrote:

> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 13:39:28
> From: Rooster <meinnetz@techmerc.dhs.org>
> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: win2k 65k errors
> 
> At 01:23 PM 3/2/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> >I would check the slashdot archives.
> >
> >My concern as a company would be "what percentage
> >of our PeeCees have the CPU/RAM/disk to even
> >THINK about running W2K?"
> >
> >If y'all haven't done it yet, read the copy on the
> >back of a W2K box at Fry's or CompUSA.
> >
> >Also, check the requirements:  32M RAM minimum.
> >Heh.
> >
> actually ms says 64mb minimum for win2k and 256mb min for win2k server.
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/upgrade/upgradereqs/default.asp
> 
> and mot is bringing in new machines, just trying to decide what os to put
> on them. 
> 
> >D
> >
> >On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Rooster wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 13:04:07
> >> From: Rooster <meinnetz@techmerc.dhs.org>
> >> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> >> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> >> Subject: win2k 65k errors
> >> 
> >> does anyone still have the link to the article about the 65,000 errors with
> >> winblows 2k? was discussing upgrade possibilities with someone at motorola
> >> and would like to have that with me to prevent conversion to that system.
> >> told them enough to make them nervous, but would like the print to fully
> >> kill the idea.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> >> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >> 
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> >http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>