win2k 65k errors

[D. Taylor]

I would check the slashdot archives.

My concern as a company would be "what percentage
of our PeeCees have the CPU/RAM/disk to even
THINK about running W2K?"

If y'all haven't done it yet, read the copy on the
back of a W2K box at Fry's or CompUSA.

Also, check the requirements:  32M RAM minimum.
Heh.

D

On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Rooster wrote:

> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 13:04:07
> From: Rooster <meinnetz@techmerc.dhs.org>
> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: win2k 65k errors
> 
> does anyone still have the link to the article about the 65,000 errors with
> winblows 2k? was discussing upgrade possibilities with someone at motorola
> and would like to have that with me to prevent conversion to that system.
> told them enough to make them nervous, but would like the print to fully
> kill the idea.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>