Re: KVM Vs. VirtualBox Vs. Proxmox

トップ ページ
添付ファイル:
Eメールのメッセージ
+ (text/plain)
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Keith Smith via PLUG-discuss
日付:  
To: Snyder, Alexander J
CC: techlists, Main PLUG discussion list
題目: Re: KVM Vs. VirtualBox Vs. Proxmox
Thanks Alexander!!

I had no idea that TrueNAS would also do virtualization.

Do you recall Novell NetWare? Was a licensed NAS of sorts and it came
to end of life in the 90's....

Keith


On 2025-01-10 13:10, Snyder, Alexander J wrote:
> On TrueNAS all VMs are KVM under the hood. It runs just like you
> expect. TrueNAS has a wizard you go through to create it, just like
> VirtualBox, but probably less capable than ProxMox as (I think) that's
> more comparable to vCenter.
>
> TrueNAS has been running my Plex Media server VM for years without any
> issue. The only reason it's not docker is because I'm using the GPU in
> the TrueNAS server, which is too big for my Docker server.
>
> ---
> Thanks,
> Alexander
>
> Sent from my Google Pixel 7 Pro
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025, 12:33 Keith Smith via PLUG-discuss
> <> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Anyone using KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) ?
>>
>> How does it compare to VirtualBox and/or Proxmox?
>>
>> Thanks!!
>>
>> Keith
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list:
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list:
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss