Oh yeah. I changed my computer name.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 10:57 AM Michael <
bmike1@gmail.com> wrote:
> And that it's only a home computer.
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 10:55 AM Michael <bmike1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just realized, while 99% of the people on this list are honest there is
>> the diabolical 1%. So I guess I enter my password for the rest of my life.
>> Or do you think that it really matters considering this is only a mailing
>> list?
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 10:22 AM Michael <bmike1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for saying this. I realized that I only needed to run apt as
>>> root. I didn't know how to make it so I could do that..... but chatgt did!
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 5:53 AM Eric Oyen via PLUG-discuss <
>>> plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> NO WORRIES FROM THIS END RUSTY.
>>>>
>>>> As a general rule, I use sudo only for very specific tasks (usually
>>>> updating my development package tree on OS X) and no where else will I run
>>>> anything as root. I have seen what happens to linux machines that run
>>>> infected binaries as root and it can get ugly pretty fast. In one case, I
>>>> couldn’t take the machine out of service because of other items I was
>>>> involved with, so I simply made part of the dir tree immutable after
>>>> replacing a few files in /etc. That would fill up the system logs with an
>>>> error message about a specific binary trying to replace a small number of
>>>> conf files. Once the offending binary was found, it made things easier
>>>> trying to disable it or get rid of it. However, after a while, I simply
>>>> pulled the drive and ran it through a Dod secure erase and installed a
>>>> newer linux bistro on it. I did use the same trick with chattr to make
>>>> /bin, /sbin and /etc immutable. That last turned out to be handy as I
>>>> caught someone trying to rootkit my machine using a known exploit, only
>>>> they couldn’t get it to run because the binaries they wanted to replace
>>>> couldn’t be written to. :)Yes, this would be a bit excessive, but over the
>>>> long run, proved far less inconvenient than having to wipe and reinstall an
>>>> OS.
>>>>
>>>> -Eric
>>>> From the central Offices of the Technomage Guild, security Applications
>>>> Dept.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On Jun 28, 2024, at 6:43 PM, Rusty Carruth via PLUG-discuss <
>>>> plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > (Deep breath. Calm...)
>>>> >
>>>> > I can't figure out how to respond rationally to the below, so all I'm
>>>> going to say is - before you call troll, you might want to research the
>>>> author, and read a bit more carefully what they wrote. I don't believe I
>>>> recommended any of the crazy things you suggest. And I certainly didn't
>>>> intend to imply any of that.
>>>> >
>>>> > On the other hand, it may not have been clear, so I'll just say
>>>> "Sorry that what I wrote wasn't clear, but english isn't my first
>>>> language. Unfortunately its the only one I know".
>>>> >
>>>> > And on that note, I'll shut up.
>>>> >
>>>> > On 6/26/24 15:05, Ryan Petris wrote:
>>>> >> I feel like you're trolling so I'm not going to spend very much time
>>>> on this.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> It's been a generally good security practice for at least the last
>>>> 25+ years to not regularly run as a privileged user, requiring some sort of
>>>> escalation to do administrative-type tasks. By using passwordless sudo,
>>>> you're taking away that escalation. Why not just run as root? Then you
>>>> don't need sudo at all. In fact, why even have a password at all? Why
>>>> encrypt? Why don't you just put all your data on a publicly accessible FTP
>>>> server and just grab stuff when you need it? The NSA has all your data
>>>> anyway and you don't have anything to hide so why not just leave it out
>>>> there for the world to see?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> As for something malicious needing to be written to use sudo, why
>>>> wouldn't it? sudo is ubiquitous on unix systems; if it didn't at least try
>>>> then that seams like a pretty dumb malicious script to me.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You also don't necessarily need to open/run something for it to run.
>>>> IIRC there was a recent image vulnerability in Gnome's tracker-miner
>>>> application which indexes files in your home directory. And before you say
>>>> that wouldn't happen in KDE, it too has a similar program, I believe called
>>>> Baloo.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> There also exists the recent doas program and the systemd
>>>> replacement run0 to do the same.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Rusty Carruth via PLUG-discuss
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> Actually, I'd like to start a bit of a discussion on this.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> First, I know that for some reason RedHat seems to think that sudo
>>>> is
>>>> >>> bad/insecure.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I'd like to know the logic there, as I think the argument FOR using
>>>> sudo
>>>> >>> is MUCH stronger than any argument I've heard (which, admittedly, is
>>>> >>> pretty close to zero) AGAINST it. Here's my thinking:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Allowing users to become root via sudo gives you:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> - VERY fine control over what programs a user can use as root
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> - The ability to remove admin privs (ability to run as root) from
>>>> an
>>>> >>> individual WITHOUT having to change root password everywhere.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Now, remember, RH is supposedly 'corporate friendly'. As a
>>>> corporation,
>>>> >>> that 2nd feature is well worth the price of admission, PLUS I can
>>>> only
>>>> >>> allow certain admins to run certain programs? Very nice.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So, for example, at my last place I allowed the 'tester' user to run
>>>> >>> fdisk as root, because they needed to partition the disk under
>>>> test. In
>>>> >>> my case, and since the network that we ran on was totally isolated
>>>> from
>>>> >>> the corporate network, I let fdisk be run without needing a
>>>> password.
>>>> >>> Oh, and if they messed up and fdisk'ed the boot partition, it was
>>>> no big
>>>> >>> deal - I could recreate the machine from scratch (minus whatever
>>>> data
>>>> >>> hadn't been copied off yet - which would only be their most recent
>>>> run),
>>>> >>> in 10 minutes (which was about 2 minutes of my time, and 8 minutes
>>>> of
>>>> >>> scripted 'dd' ;-) However, if the test user wanted to become root
>>>> using
>>>> >>> su, they had to enter the test user password.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So, back to the original question - setting sudo to not require a
>>>> >>> password. We should have asked, what program do you want to run as
>>>> root
>>>> >>> without requiring a password? How secure is your system? What else
>>>> do
>>>> >>> you use it for? Who has access? etc, etc, etc.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> There's one other minor objection I have to the 'zero defense'
>>>> statement
>>>> >>> below - the malicious thing you downloaded (and, I assume ran) has
>>>> to be
>>>> >>> written to USE sudo in its attempt to break in, I believe, or it
>>>> >>> wouldn't matter HOW open your sudo was. (simply saying 'su -
>>>> myscript'
>>>> >>> won't do it).
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> And, if you're truly paranoid about stuff you download, you should:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 1 - NEVER download something you don't have an excellent reason to
>>>> >>> believe is 'safe', and ALWAYS make sure you actually downloaded it
>>>> from
>>>> >>> where you thought you did.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 2 - For the TRULY paranoid, have a machine you use to download and
>>>> test
>>>> >>> software on, which you can totally disconnect from your network (not
>>>> >>> JUST the internet), and which has NO confidential info, and which
>>>> you
>>>> >>> can erase and rebuild without caring. Run the downloaded stuff
>>>> there,
>>>> >>> for a long time, until you're pretty sure it won't bite you.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 3 - For the REALLY REALLY paranoid, don't download anything from
>>>> >>> anywhere, disconnect from the internet permanently, get high-tech
>>>> locks
>>>> >>> for your doors, and wrap your house in a faraday cage!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> And probably don't leave the house....
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The point of number 3 is that there is always a risk, even with
>>>> >>> 'well-known' software, and as someone else said - they're watching
>>>> you
>>>> >>> anyway. The question is how 'safe' do you want to be? And how
>>>> paranoid
>>>> >>> are you, really?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Wow, talk about rabbit hole! ;-)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 'Let the flames begin!' :-)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On 6/25/24 18:50, Ryan Petris via PLUG-discuss wrote:
>>>> >>>>> wanted sudo not to require a password.
>>>> >>>> Please reconsider this... This is VERY BAD security practice.
>>>> There's basically zero defense if you happen to download/run something
>>>> malicious.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, at 6:01 PM, Michael via PLUG-discuss wrote:
>>>> >>>>> then I remember that a PLUG member mentioned ChatGPT being good
>>>> at troubleshooting so I figured I'd give it a go. I sprint about half an
>>>> hour asking it the wrong question but after that it took 2 minutes. I
>>>> wanted sudo not to require a password. it is wonderful! now I don't have to
>>>> bug you guys. so it looks like this is the end of the user group unless you
>>>> want to talk about OT stuff.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> --
>>>> >>>>> :-)~MIKE~(-:
>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list: PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> >>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> >>>>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list: PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> >>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> >>>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list: PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> >>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>> >>>
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> > PLUG-discuss mailing list: PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> > https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list: PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>>
>>>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list:
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)