you have 2 options, Im my case I used an ubiquity edgerouter lite and it
has Wan +2 Lan ports and full commercial tools for management. but it can
be set to amd a dmz on one port, and your network on the other port in very
little time.
https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgerouter-lite/
If you want the All in one route, the other one I have used with great
success is the netgear Nighthawk c7000, I only retired it when I moved from
Cable to Fiber.
https://www.netgear.com/home/products/networking/cable-modems-routers/C7000.aspx
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:04 AM Bob Elzer <
bob.elzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I need advice on a docs is 3.0 cable modem.
>
> I just bought a Motorola mb7220-10, it turns out there is nothing that is
> configurable.
>
> It's hard coded to 192.168.100 and I want 192.168.0
>
> There's no DMZ or port forwarding. This was not clear when I ordered it.
>
> So I'm looking for one that I can configure with a DMZ and set to
> 192.168.0, I don't need WiFi and I'd like it to cost under $100. My
> download speed will only be 30mb so I don't need docsis 3.1
>
> Anyone have any recommendations?
>
> Thanks
> Bob
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 1:36 PM Stephen Partington <cryptworks@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In some places they even have fiber to the prem. (me)
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:02 PM Michael Butash <michael@butash.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You need to make sure your modem supports 3.1 too, don't forget that.
>>>
>>> Cox has just recently finished upgrading to all the new 3.1 hardware
>>> here, and phoenix tends to be their technology leader market due to being
>>> their biggest, so I'd be surprised if comcast has done more rural areas.
>>> They always seem to be the first to fight any sort of rural network
>>> legislation as they hate wasting their capital on non-rich areas, so make
>>> sure they can even support the 8-24 channels down needed for those speeds.
>>> You'd be amazed how screwed up cable plants can be in rural/old areas that
>>> in some cases, they just cannot support the rates. Tempe was like this for
>>> a long while here due to the original podunk cable co that built it.
>>>
>>> Cox is actually one of the better cable MSO's out there sadly. My first
>>> job in tech in '99 was @home networks that pioneered cable modem tech, and
>>> taught the cable behemoths about that little internet thing, and dealing
>>> with them all from comcast, cox, intermedia, att, and others, cox was
>>> always one of the least crappy of them. So much I even worked for them
>>> after for a bit (more crappy to work for imho). Not perfect, but
>>> definitely better. If you like to pirate media, oddly they were one of the
>>> strongest to reject lawsuits, abuse subpoenas, and other media cartel
>>> incursions on human rights, where comcast (being the ultimate media whore
>>> thanks to corrupt/owned fcc) is the opposite...
>>>
>>> That said, I've been having more frequent outages (including 2
>>> yesterday) with Cox, and they're steadily warning and charging me for
>>> bandwidth now, so I'm having Centurylink installed to check out that is
>>> almost double the speed and $25 less than my cox bill now. As much as I
>>> hate Centurylink, they don't have the bandwidth caps, that started with
>>> Comcast coincidentally, and Cox can stick it now (pun intended) that they
>>> impose them too if I'm just going to go over monthly. Joy of having both
>>> services at least temporarily is I can steer traffic out either/both with
>>> my Fortigate firewall with sd-wan features, so going to play a month or two
>>> before I can one or the other to see...
>>>
>>> -mb
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Jim <jim.nantz15@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I found out Tuesday what was causing me to not get the speed I was told
>>>> I should get. Once again the Comcast guy I was talking to said he wanted
>>>> to send out a repairman to find out why I wasn't getting the 150 Mbps
>>>> everything told him I should be getting. Tuesday morning the repairman
>>>> showed up with his supervisor. The supervisor told me the 150 Mbps speed
>>>> is for customers in areas that are served with a docsis 3.1 network, but
>>>> where I live is served by a docsis 3.1 network. Because of this I get 100
>>>> Mbps, but could get 150 if I wanted to pay more. Then he said the network
>>>> in this area isn't able to supply everyone with 150 Mbps, and no he doesn't
>>>> know when this area will be upgraded. I was amazed that all the corporate
>>>> people I talked to didn't know that this was the case. They all said I
>>>> should be getting 150.
>>>>
>>>> After the repairman and his boss left, I called and emailed the
>>>> corporate people who had been telling me I should be getting 150 and told
>>>> them what the local supervisor said. Later one of them called back and
>>>> agreed with me that since I had been told I should be getting 150, that he
>>>> would give it to me for the price I'm paying now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is Cox as fscked up as Comcast?
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
>> rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)