That's what I figured. Arch and Ubuntu are big, mainstream distros.
Those whose needs are best served by lesser known distros that
booted perfectly with mbr might have trouble if they haven't devoted
many programmer hours to jumping through not only UEFI hoops, but also
bad UEFI implementations from the hardware manufacturer.
And, of course, Secure Boot hasn't even entered the discussion yet.
SteveT
On Fri, 4 May 2018 20:44:56 -0700
Stephen Partington <
cryptworks@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same machine with Arch and Ubuntu.
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 03 May 2018 23:19:56 +0000
> > Stephen Partington <cryptworks@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have had no issues with UEFI and Linux. The only time I have
> > > arguments with it is surrounding the secure boot process and
> > > playing nice with windows
> >
> > Were you using one of the big distros? I'm pretty sure life with
> > UEFI isn't as sanguine when you use one of the less used distros.
> >
> > SteveT
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)
