so, does this mean that the UEFI might get patched first? OR, does the OS ecology have to do so first? Lastly, how much of a performance hit will this represent?
-eric
from the central offices of the Technomage Guild, the "oh look! yet another bug!" Dept.
On Jan 2, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Matthew Crews wrote:
>
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/02/intel_cpu_design_flaw/
>
> In a nutshell, it is a major security flaw in Intel hardware dating back a decade that is requiring a complete kernel rewrite for every major OS (Linux, Windows, Mac, etc) in order to patch out. It cannot be patched out with a CPU microcode update. Major enough that code comments are redacted in the patches until an embargo period is expired. Also the reported fix will have a huge performance impact.
>
> Also crucial to note is that AMD chips are not affected by this.
>
> How the heck does something like this go unnoticed for so long?
>
>
>
>
> Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)