What you can do is disable DHCP on the second router (The one not
connected to your ISP). Then connect the LAN port of the second router
to the LAN on the First router. It is important that you have the DHCP
service disabled on the second router! Do not use the Internet/WAN port
of the second router.
Gilbert
On 7/18/2014 2:51 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
> is there a way turn NAT off in the second router?
>
> :-)~MIKE~(-:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Michael Havens <bmike1@gmail.com
> <mailto:bmike1@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> you are correct. that is what I've done and what is going on. I
> don't have a switch.... only the other router. I'm mad at
> myself..... I had a switch but got rid of it before I moved to FL.
>
> :-)~MIKE~(-:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr.
> <mailing-lists@phoenixinternet.net
> <mailto:mailing-lists@phoenixinternet.net>> wrote:
>
> What I think you are doing is using NAT between your 2
> networks. Below is my approximation of your system patched
> together from your comments...
> 1. You have the router that is connected to your ISP. It is
> performing NAT and handing out a private network to anything
> on its LAN and WIFI interfaces.
> 2. You have a second router that has its Internet/WAN
> interface connected to one of the LAN interfaces on the first
> router. It is also performing NAT and handing out a second
> private network on its LAN and WIFI interfaces.
>
> You WOULD be able to connect via SSH from a device connected
> to the router listed in point 2 to a device connected to the
> router listed in point 1. You WOULD NOT be able to connect
> from the device connected to the router listed in point 2 FROM
> a device connected to the router listed in point 1 due to NAT.
>
> There are ways to get beyond this and only have one network
> utilizing 2 SOHO routers. I would always recommend for anyone
> who has limited network experience to only use one router and
> use a combination of switches and access points to extend
> wired LANs and provide better WIFI coverage. If the setup is
> how I described, you may have other issues due to DOUBLE NAT
> that you just have not recognized yet.
>
> Gilbert
>
>
> On 7/18/2014 12:30 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
> telnet localhost 22 from the server received no answer
> from the client
> telnet 192.168.1.101 22 from the client received no answer
> from the server
>
> I'll get back to you about the research project
> (and as a private message)
>
> :-)~MIKE~(-:
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> <mailto:PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org>
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss